A colleague of mine once remarked that office politics in universities are so intense because the stakes are so small. Same too for companies except in some cases the stakes grow and the battles simmer.
Another friend recently reported that she’s in the midst of a big political battle and this got me wondering about the source of politics, the role that the organization plays in fostering politics and what politics are to begin with.
Having not spent much time in big organizations I had to do some serious thinking about what politics really are and I’ve decided that it’s an attempt to gain power so that one can do one’s job. Wikipedia says that it’s the use of power for the pursuit of self-interest without regard to the effect on the organizations ability to achieve its own goals.
But I don’t buy this. I think politics exist when someone is trying to achieve his or her own organizational objectives, not personal ones. I think people are just trying to do their job to the best of their ability and meet the goals set out for their role in the organization. The difference is important because if the source of politics is personal then the organization doesn’t have a role in it. But if the source is organizational then you can blame the company for its existence.
When people have to fight for resources including funding, personnel, authority and even attention to get their jobs done then politics will break out. The fight isn’t one to gain personally but to gain by achieving their own organizational objectives. That’s why the organization is at fault. It has created an environment where people have to battle internally to do their jobs.
You’re back!! I missed your blog posts.
Yours is the best definition of office politics I’ve seen. It was a bit of an “aha” moment. From my view of the world, office politics was at its worst when competition for resources was fierce … only I never recognized it as such. Great observation!
Back again, yes and fortunately not subject to office politics.
Bang on when you say organizational fault!
If it were possible to quantify the amount of energy invested into interpersonal/inter-departmental leveraging vs. direct, objective-oriented efforts it’d be interesting to see where resources are best being directed and the returns on effort.
Now if your blogging patterns remain consistent (and I’m sitting on the curve ball), I’m interested to know why the alarm bells don’t need to ring out when any particular Manager receives too much push-back from his constituents…I mean staff.
Welcome back Charles.
Funny thing is that everything is really always the boss’s fault but the boss never sees it that way.